When you use Chicago 17th edition
Chicago style comes from the Chicago Manual of Style, now in its 17th edition, and it is the standard in history, art history, philosophy and much of publishing. It is older and more detailed than APA or MLA, which is why the manual itself is over a thousand pages. You need about five of those pages worth of rules for a normal student paper.
Chicago actually contains two different systems. Notes and bibliography uses numbered footnotes or endnotes plus a bibliography at the end, and it is what humanities courses almost always mean when they say Chicago. Author-date looks like APA, with citations such as (Smith 2023, 45) in the text, and shows up in some social science courses. This page and the generator above produce the notes and bibliography form.
One habit that saves a lot of cleanup: bibliography entries and footnotes format the same information differently. The bibliography inverts the author name and separates blocks with periods. The footnote keeps the name in normal order, uses commas, and wraps the publication details in parentheses. Mixing the two forms is the most common Chicago mistake there is.
The formats, with real examples
Paste your source into the tool above and it fills these in for you. If you would rather see the pattern, here is exactly what each one looks like.
In-text citations
The author-date variant of Chicago does use parentheses, like (Brown 2021, 87), but only use it if your course explicitly asks for author-date.